CAPPS - Avocacy and Communication Professional Development

California Association of Private Postsecondary Schools

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit against ITT Educational Services, Inc

03/13/2013

. MARCH 11, 2013.  Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) (http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/ittinc/) today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on behalf of purchasers of ITT Educational Services, Inc. (“ITT”) (NYSE:ESI) common stock during the period between April 22, 2010 and February 25, 2013 (the “Class Period”).

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff’s counsel, Darren Robbins of Robbins Geller at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. . If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/ittinc/. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

The complaint charges ITT and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ITT is a provider of post-secondary degree programs in the United States.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, defendants issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business and financial results in press releases, analyst conference calls and filings with the SEC, specifically with respect to the Company’s compliance with relevant accounting standards when reporting its risk-sharing activities in loan programs. As a result of defendants’ false statements, ITT stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $112.69 per share on April 22, 2010.

On February 22, 2013, after the market closed, ITT filed its Form 10-K with the SEC for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2012. The Form 10-K disclosed that the SEC was investigating ITT’s involvement in some private student-loan agreements. ITT revealed that it had received a subpoena from the SEC on February 8, 2013, along with a letter informing the Company of the investigation. The subpoena issued by the SEC requested documents related to a 2009 loan risk-sharing agreement and ITT’s PEAKS Private Student Loan Program (“PEAKS Program”). As a result of this news, ITT’s stock plunged $3.10 per share to close at $15.53 per share on February 25, 2013, a one-day decline of nearly 17% on volume of over 1.7 million shares.

According to the complaint, the true facts, which were known by the defendants but concealed from the investing public during the Class Period, were as follows: (a) the Company failed to properly account for the 2009 loan risk-sharing agreement and its PEAKS Program; and (b) the Company failed to maintain proper internal controls to ensure that risk-sharing agreements were properly recorded.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of ITT common stock during the Class Period (the “Class”). The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.

Robbins Geller represents U.S. and international institutional investors in contingency-based securities and corporate litigation. With nearly 200 lawyers in nine offices, the firm represents hundreds of public and multi-employer pension funds with combined assets under management in excess of $2 trillion. The firm has obtained many of the largest recoveries in history and has been ranked number one in the number of shareholder class action recoveries in MSCI’s Top SCAS 50 every year since 2003. According to Cornerstone Research, the firm’s recoveries have averaged 35% above the median for all firms over the past seven years (2005-2011). Please visit http://www.rgrdlaw.com for more information.